Guest blogger Rosa Castro Feinberg, retired Florida International associate professor and chairwoman of the LULAC Florida Education Advisory Committee, writes her views as the Legislature considers a bill to reduce ESOL training for reading teachers:

"Senate Bill 0286 would harm English language learners by eliminating the requirement that Reading teachers earn the 300 hour endorsement in ESOL when they are assigned English language learners. Instead, the bill would slash the requirement to a mere 60 hours of training. The truthfulness of this statement is not a function of my motivation, my income, or its sources.

Had I earned millions from the sale of my products or services to school districts, it would be in keeping with the country’s tradition of private enterprise that honors the profit motive. Witness the appointment of the CEO of Academica Corporation, a for-profit charter management company, as chair of Florida’s Charter School Review Panel. Evidently the state of Florida finds nothing improper about offering policy advice in an area where you also make money.   

Nevertheless, supporters of this bill have alleged that there is something sinister afoot when experts in the fields of second language learning and policy development publish their research and serve as consultants. Their carping fails to take into account the duties of higher education faculty.

Faculty members have three areas of responsibility: teaching, service
to their institution, the profession, and the community; and research
and publications. Faculty members must document their activities in
these three areas, are evaluated in these three areas, and receive
recognition and awards on the basis of their accomplishments in these
three areas. Academics who don’t publish risk loss of employment. State
law (Florida’s School Community Professional Development Act)
specifically directs public postsecondary educational institutions to
work collaboratively with school districts to establish a coordinated
system of professional development.  Of course we publish, and of
course, we consult. We’re supposed to.

In my own case, I have not earned so much as one cent from school
districts in consulting fees or from the sale of materials for ESOL
in-service training. I have never published a textbook for K-12
students.  My articles don’t generate royalties as that is not the
practice among peer reviewed journals. My most recent royalty
generating book is a reference book and is freely available in public
and college libraries. Many of my publications are available, at no
cost, at libraries and through internet sources.

I began phased retirement in 1996. I don’t receive a salary from any
source. I am not paid for my advocacy activities from any source. 

I return to the issue. Senate Bill 0286 would harm English language
learners by eliminating the requirement that Reading teachers earn the
300 hour endorsement in ESOL when they are assigned English language
learners. Instead, the bill would slash the requirement to a mere 60
hours of training.  Those who would dispute that statement must first
address it. Those who cannot, and choose instead to go on witch hunts
while cravenly cloaked in anonymity only help to make the case
presented so effectively by parents, teachers, and community groups
that Governor Crist vetoed this same bill last session.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists